Trump Administration Moves to Strip American Bar Association of Law School Accreditation Power

Share

The U.S. Department of Education has recommended stripping the American Bar Association of its decades long authority to accredit the nation’s law schools, intensifying a long-running clash between the Trump administration and the country’s most prominent legal organization.

What did the Education Department recommend?

Career staff at the department issued a recommendation denying the ABA’s bid to renew its federal recognition as an accreditor of U.S. law schools. The finding, laid out in an extensive report, argues that the ABA failed to keep its accreditation operations sufficiently separate and independent from its broader role as a professional and advocacy association for lawyers, raising concerns about conflicts of interest in how it evaluates the schools it oversees.

Why does this matter for law schools and students?

The ABA has held federal recognition to accredit law schools since 1952 and currently oversees nearly 200 institutions nationwide. For law schools that operate independently of a university, that accreditation determines whether their students can access federal student aid. Losing the designation could also complicate the path to bar exam eligibility and professional licensing for future graduates, depending on how individual states respond.

What is driving the administration’s push?

President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers have repeatedly accused the ABA of leaning politically left and using its accreditation authority to advance diversity, equity and inclusion policies within legal education. Assistant Education Secretary David Barker compared the current accreditation system to a cartel, arguing that a lack of competition among accrediting bodies allows organizations to inject their own ideological preferences into the review process. The move follows earlier friction between the administration and the ABA, including a prior decision to cut the organization out of its traditional role vetting judicial nominees.

How has the ABA responded?

The chair of the ABA’s Accreditation Council, Melissa Hart, said the council believes it is in compliance with federal accreditation requirements and applicable law. She said the organization intends to address any misconceptions and clarify its record when it appears before a federal advisory committee reviewing the matter next month.

What happens next?

The recommendation is not a final decision. It will go before the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, a bipartisan federal panel, for review in September. That committee will then issue its own recommendation to a senior Education Department official, who holds final authority over whether the ABA loses its accreditor status. A conclusive outcome remains several months away, meaning law schools currently under ABA oversight are not expected to see immediate changes to their accreditation status.

Read more

Read More